Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Chesa Boudin: a Latin American "Gringo"




            Chesa Boudin is a world traveler. He is a Chicago kid. He is the child of politically incarcerated parents. He is an American scholar. He is a lecturer and a journalist.
Boudin has experienced Latin America from the inside, a dual perspective of playing the “gringo” wild card when necessary while also attempting to fit in as best as possible and gain acceptance and access.
“With one hand cuffed to a barely visible abyss of poverty and incarceration, and the other grasped in the confident handshakes of those accustomed to privilege and comfort, I learned to move freely between different universes,” says Boudin in his book
At a mere twenty-eight years young, the curious traveler has already experienced the sadness and sensations of local and foreign struggles.
Both of Boudin’s parents were imprisoned when he was only eleven months old, after their involvement in a politically motivated armed robbery gone wrong. Boudin was then taken in and raised by close family friends.
He describes his upbringing as “my four parents’ group efforts made feasible the transitions between the mostly white, middle-class, private school day-to-day and the mostly poor, black, and Latino prison system that was a constant thread in my life. I lived in parallel worlds.”
Boudin always chooses to travel by chicken bus, regardless how many hours the journey will take. He chooses to live alongside the people, to better understand the cultural divide and the extreme poverty that so much of the world endures.
He shares his observations in his book, Gringo.



In regards to politics and culture, his new autobiographical travelogue, takes the reader along on Boudin’s Latin American adventures, unconventional in every way and furtively introspective.
His writes his coming-of-age memoir with numerous footnotes echoing the standpoint of a young man, aching to acquire a better grasp of the world.
Perusing through numerous countries, over nearly a decade, Boudin exposes his most personal relationships with locals, and comments on every aspect of social and political culture that he comes across.
Boudin is first and foremost a journalist, and with this viewpoint he is able to clearly convey detailed, sometimes dense information in a fun, glued-to-your-book kind of way.
The story begins when an eighteen-year-old Boudin travels to Guatemala for a Spanish immersion experience after finishing his high school credits early.
He then goes on to explore the Chilean landscape with a Rotary International scholarship, where he watches police and protestors clash on September 11, 2001.
            In Argentina, he witnesses an economic crisis in the capital city of Buenos Aires.
While visiting Brazil, he travels down the Amazon to rural countrysides and witnesses the true extent of rural poverty and the economic tug of war between natives and corporate interests.
Later in Venezuela, he works inside Chavez’s palace translating documents from Spanish to English.
He joins his adopted mother and a Franciscan nun on a civil rights mission in Colombia.
He learns of Ecuadoran oil pipeline proposals, and environmental destruction outside Quito. He observes a political power struggle that inevitably leads to bloodshed.
In Bolivia, he explores silver mines, and comes face to face with the socio-political ramifications of being a miner. He learns of death and “dying” wages.
Throughout each adventure Boudin makes many dear friends, and uses colorful descriptions and conversational settings to place the reader in every experience. The book is both insightful and objective. He brings forth fascinating and factual information to young readers in a breezy, engaging, and consistent manner.

New Beck/ Charlotte Gainsbourg Video

Educate me, please


       Transfer student orientation at San Francisco State was a total buzz kill. All the preemptive excitement of finally transferring to the big leagues from a modest city college vanished. The eight pre-registration units we had been promised were no longer available, due to cuts. The class schedule was still unknown, due to cuts. Within my program department, further ills, due to cuts.
Every piece of available information seemed to contradict itself. They stressed the point of not exceeding 120 units, although countless classes were no longer offered. They joked seriously about handing Spring 2009 graduates diplomas because they had exceeded the unit cap, regardless of desired goals or achievement. Welcome to San Francisco State kids, good luck, now please leave.
I left orientation feeling far from thrilled.
And then came the harsh reality of university furloughs. Unlike the days of high school, I truly want to be here. I pay to be here. Eliminating school days and cutting faculty pay are inevitably leading to poorer quality of education and frustrated students and teachers. I am beginning to understand why some students spend such exorbitant prices on their educations: so that when the state budget goes awry, they don’t have to hold their breath and wait to have something taken away.
In these economically trying times, state-funded institutions of higher education are all facing the same sad reality. Whether you’re a student at one of California’s 112 community colleges, 23 California State Universities, or 10 University of California campuses, buckle up ‘cause you’re in for a ride.
 “I couldn’t get into any of the classes that I needed. I think I’m going to have to take summer school. It’s annoying,” said SFSU student Abby Viselman. Annoying, to say the very least.
There are approximately 450,000 students and 46,000 employed faculty members in the CSU system. According to its website, it is currently facing a “$564 million budget deficit for 2009-2010,” these are big numbers folks, and to remedy the astronomic financial boo-boo, we all lose. Fewer students will be admitted and the ones currently attending will face a fee hike. “Overall, CSU is looking to reduce its enrollment by 40,000 students system wide for 2010-2011.”
Our dedicated professors and faculty members are being hit with a 9.23 percent pay cut. Dedication to education has got to get tough when things go this far south.
All areas of student life are affected. Quality of physical and emotional student healthcare has plunged. “It’s like there’s no time to teach,” said SFSU student health educator Albert J. Angelo. “This is not what it’s supposed to be like. Education is the only service where we as humans are okay getting ripped off. We see it as a paper thing, once I get my degree I’ll get a job.”
But this is obviously not so. Economic woe spreads far and nationwide.
So who’s to blame? Good question. I think Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger deserves credit. After all he is responsible for “fixing” the mess. He originally proposed a $410 million reduction to the CSU system alone. We now find cuts to the UC and CSU funding combined to be “just under $2 billion total,” states the governor’s budget. Rather than reducing other state spending such as prison funding, or raising taxes, he chooses to lower the educational standard.
And what is there to do? How can we, as students and teachers, protest this horrendous blow to the system we rely so heavily upon? One answer is “walk outs,” in which multiple campuses have already partaken. The International Students for Social Equality led a walk out at UC Berkeley and other campuses on September 24, in protest. SFSU and SF City College joined in solidarity.
Does this sort of activism even help? Leaving class in turn means one less day of school. “It seems like protesting cutting school days by taking another day off school doesn’t really help to solve the problem,” said UC Berkeley student Gracie Martin.
So what then? The Associated Students, Inc. of SF State is taking some noteworthy steps to deal with this problem. Recently they have led school rallies to protest the budget cuts. Rather than walking out, they are staying and sharing their strife, collectively, loud and clear.
An ultimate solution is hard to pin point, but as with most problems this immense, it’s all about taking baby steps in the right direction. Most importantly we must always stand up for what we believe and against what we do not.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Guiding laws in legal journalism


    Most aspiring journalists at SFSU seem to be leading towards spot news, feature writing, or sports coverage. Some focus primarily on capturing dramatic and newsworthy photographs. Others may not be entirely sure of their specific journalistic interests yet. But all surely desire the sweet inspiring sensation of witnessing a professional journalist reporting on none other but, themselves.
    Jim Wheaton recently led a discussion at SFSU among three reporters who cover the courts system. Journalism students filled the class room, and a more obscure field was unveiled to us. This area focused on legal journalism, and more specifically covering court cases, opinions,  and lawyers, translating legalese into English, and the business of law.
The following text highlights each journalists’ experiential tips and advice for success.

Pam MacLean, has covered the federal courts for UPI, the Daily Journal and others.
On covering court cases:
  • [Journalism is] lots of fun, the best profession a person can have
  •  Huge range of stories from Hells Angels to PG&E to Loma Prieta
  •  Federal court is less accessible then state (no camera, tape recorder)
  • Issue: judges closing courtroom (very rare, but does happen)
  • Sealing documents is more common- get a card (press pass ID), write letter of request to court to unseal document (save lawyer and $)
  • Very often judge just forgets that public may desire sealed info
  • When talking to the judge: “Your honor may I address the court…” “I object respectfully to courtroom closing.”
  • Reference the 1st and 14th amendments as needed
  • Understand the meaning of “open” and “closed” courtrooms and cases
  • ImportantCultivate sources!!!
  • Think outside the box
  • What happens if: earthquake, power outage, cell towers down- Always know how to be able to report in any situation
  • Never misquote
  • Issue: learn to deal with intimidation (from sources, lawyers, etc.)
  • Tipalways be nice to court clerks and staff- eventually they will help you out
  • Interviewing prisoners: must go through prison system, they must want to see you, and you must be on their visitor list
Fiona Smith, Daily Journal
On covering case opinions and translating legalese to English:
  • When covering ongoing cases: the best documents are the motion for summary judgment (quick summary), and the initial complaint (good overview
  • To understand cases quickly: read headings, breeze through text, don’t try to read the whole thing, then get comments from sources
  • Writing about cases: attempt to paint broad picture, highlighting  negative vs. positive and remembering “why am I writing this?”
  • Tip: call early to set up interviews for later, then go back and read through brief (remember to always call and e-mail)
  • Always read footnotes in justices’ opinions: they tend to speak informally and therefore are more quotable (can be funny a/o interesting addition)
  • Finding case sources: if you can’t get to lawyer, call lawyers involved in a similar case
  •  If there is outside involvement in case it is potentially a big deal- take note
  • Obtaining case information: often law firms have blogs, sign up for e-mail alerts
  • Know about judges: this adds depth to writing--remember that appellate judges are appointed and have political affiliation
  • Legalese is hard to translate- don’t get too caught up in lingo
  • Always ask lawyers: “Is this important?” and “does this matter?”
  • Know some terms. For example:
"THE REMAINDER MAN WAS SEIZED IN FREE." Means: The last person on the will got the property
  • Remember: just because something is filed, doesn’t mean it’s true

Jill Redhage, Daily Journal
On the business of law and covering lawyers:
  • Began covering crime beat, worked way up to law
  • Remember: writing for lawyers changes what news is
  • Hardest personal challenge: getting over reputation of journalists as being “pesky, nosy, and pushy”
  • Also: challenging to be a F/T reporter and have to write soldier obituaries
  • Tip: The more journalists are forced into awkward situations, the better reporters they become, “Just do it!”
  •  How do you get used to talking to people who don’t want to talk to you? “Keep doing it!”
  • Business beat covers bankruptcy, layoffs, mergers, etc.
  • Tip: publications are hiring right now for business beats
  • On transitioning from courts to business: “learn cultivation of beat, have sources streaming everyday, and know private companies versus public companies.” Private are not required to show anything
  • Tip: Shmooze! Meet and greets will get you far. Learn from sources (lawyers), ask “teach me about _____ law!”
  • When a story breaks: write before and be the first, obtain early information by being internal to the company, know inside sources
  • Get a sense of power distribution in any industry
  • Get to know decision makers, they will verify info
  • Remember: sources will mostly be 30+ years older, which puts beginning journalists at a disadvantage, so:
           1)   be confident
           2)   realize you have something they want (power of positive press)
           3)   try to get to know these people
  • Tip on interviewing (learned from fellow reporter): “how you ask a question will frame the kind of answer that you get.” Therefore:
          1)   ask simple, direct yes or no questions.
          2)   Wait.
          3)   Their instinct will be to answer truthfully
  • Often the best questions are statements: “tell me about your childhood…” or “I’d love to hear more about…”
  • Lastly, never fear awkward silence

For further reading and useful sources for law journalism information check out:
The Reporter’s Handbook by Steve Weinberg (chapter on courts and judiciary system)
Cand.uscourts.gov
Pacer.com access to documents
Calbar.ca.gov

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Prop C blows out the candle in Candlestick Park



Proposition C guarantees that the honorary name, Candlestick Park, will once again change.
The passing of Proposition C ultimately repeals 2004’s passing of Proposition H, no longer requiring Candlestick Park to keep its name.
This will result in the imminent re-naming of Candlestick Park to something like Chase Stadium or The Olive Garden Arena.
No doubt it will be far less catchy and shamelessly commercial.
58% voted yes to Prop C.
This means that the sale of naming rights will then be used to fund the directors of City Recreation centers. Everyone needs a paycheck, and this is how the city will pay.
A little background: In 2004, the 49ers sold the naming rights to Monstercable and in turn the city received $3 million. This agreement ended in 2008. Now, once again, the name is up for sale with the 49ers and the city eventually benefitting 50/50 from this proposition with the eventual sale.
Prop C is a continuation of the Open Space Fund, which covers costs that succeed budgets for everything from building public swimming pools to renovating golf courses in metropolitan San Francisco.
This all strikes me as sad and I am wondering why we, the people of San Francisco, must sacrifice the simple integrity of a well-known sports arena such as Candlestick Park so that Dunkin can sell more donuts.
An obvious answer is that we are a consumer culture, and are therefore bought and sold accordingly. Sadly, I hope this is not the whole truth.
The Giants named this park in 1959 when they once called it home, and the 49ers continue to play here today.
The Beatles played their final show here in 1966.
Amazing and wonderful events have happened here. It seems its name might deserve a little more respect.
And this is not just happening here. Places of leisure once named after significant human beings or icons are quickly and steadily being replaced with logos after being sold to corporations. 
One example: The Luther Burbank Center in Santa Rosa- originally named after the American botanist and horticulturalist responsible for developing over 800 strains and varieties of plants -is now, sadly, The Wells Fargo Center- named after a great American bank?! Bah humbug.
Candlestick Park will now be bought out as well. It’s only a matter of time.
I imagine corporations are already making offers.
A truth I can honor: we are all experiencing tough economic times, and some things just must happen.
Money, then, doesn’t grow on trees, but Astroturf in this case.



Tuesday, November 3, 2009